Till the 1980s, private enterprise was somewhat of a social pariah in India. Economic liberalisation in the 1990s reconfigured the equation. As the Indian corporate sector became the ‘poster boy’ for the India growth story, a number of policies were drawn up to support corporate growth. Recent announcements are signalling an interesting directional shift in Indian policymaking towards industry, investment and its interaction with society at large.
1) Environment matters. In a landmark decision to safeguard the environment while implementing industrial projects, India’s Environment and Forests Minister, Jairam Ramesh, announced that the bauxite mining clearance given to Vedanta Resources and the Orissa Mining Corporation in Orissa had been withdrawn. He also said an initial approval for a six-fold expansion to Vedanta’s aluminium refinery in the state was being suspended. According to a source, the Saxena Report on the matter had said that allowing mining operations would mean a loss of 121,000 trees, affect the region’s water supply and will shake the “faith of tribal people in the laws of the land”. The Ministry has also barred the Vedanta refinery from buying bauxite — the main raw material needed to make aluminium — from 11 other mines in the state of Jharkhand, pointing out that these were illegal.
2) Property rights. Anyone who has heard of Singur or Nandigram will know just how sensitive the issue of land, and its acquisition, can be in India. As the race for economic growth is intensifying across states in India, so are the pulls and pressures on land.
The Indian Government’s ambitious road-building programme aimed at laying 18,637 km of expressways by 2022 has hit a road-block as well on this count. According to some estimates, delays in land acquisition are hampering 70% of the projects under this programme. Towards addressing this issue, the Congress President, Sonia Gandhi has intervened and sought annuity benefits for displaced farmers. These are likely to be woven into in the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2010 and the Resettlement and Rehabilitation Bill, 2010. Individual states, such are Haryana and Uttar Pradesh, are experimenting with compensation formulae blending cash, annuities and equity.
Towards addressing concerns regarding fair compensation in the mining sector, the Indian Government is likely to make it mandatory for mining companies to hand over a part of their revenues and make annual payments to those displaced. The revenue sharing model combined with annual payments is likely to find its way into a proposed legislation - the Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Bill - setting the rules for investment in minerals.
3) CSR = compulsory social responsibility. According to news reports, the new Companies Bill will make it mandatory for large companies to earmark at least 2 per cent of their net profit for corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities in the new Companies Bill. The new provisions are expected to apply to companies having a net worth of `500 crores (approximately US$109 million) or more, or a turnover of `1,000 crores (US$ 218 million) or more, or a net profit of `5 crores (US$ 1.1 million) or more, during a year. The revised Bill is expected to be presented in Parliament for passage in the Winter Session.
That the intention exists to foster social contribution is commendable. Whether this is the appropriate intervention is moot.
These shifting sands reflect India’s desire for inclusive growth. How these, and similar policy shifts, will play out in a company’s calculus remains to be seen.
If you would like deeper insights to India and what it means for your company, do write in at ratika.jain@whiteowladvisory.com.
3 comments:
Public policy in India is, to borrow your term `shifting sands`. in spite of the obvious implications for long-term well being of the country.
Airports, telecom,mining, SEZs, private real estate development,power plants-- each has a different story to tell.
A multi-sectoral policy consistently based on economic, social and climate sustainability is the answer.
Well said Mallikarjun
Mining firms may have to pay 25% more for land, rehabilitation according to India's Tribal Affairs Minister http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/indl-goods-/-svs/metals--mining/Mining-firms-will-have-to-pay-25-more-for-land-rehabilitation-Bhuria/articleshow/6655130.cms
Post a Comment