Obama’s Indian Odyssey

‘Should the West be scared?’

This question was posed on a BBC panel discussion earlier this week, in the light of President Obama’s recently concluded visit to India and Prime Minister Cameron’s trip to China. While this particular discussion was limited, it has been interesting to observe the somewhat dismissive coverage in the British media about the visit. Interesting, given the takeaways from the Cameron visit to India in July this year (see earlier blog).

Having personally been involved with a number of head of state visits to India over the last two decades, including President Clinton’s visit to India in March 2000, here is my take on the messages for business – both overt and covert – from President Obama’s game-changing and mesmerising visit to India.

1. Recognition of a new world order. During his trip, President Obama has peppered each of his speeches with unequivocal assertion to the fact that relationships have changed and that ‘we need to change with them’. His comment that the US-India partnership will be the ‘defining partnership of the 21st century’, his description of India as ‘indispensable’ and a ‘cornerstone’ of US policy in Asia and his wish to see India take up a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, speak volumes of the paradigm shift that has taken place in the mindset of the world’s largest economy. To quote President Obama, 'India isn't emerging, it has emerged'.
2. It’s (also) the economy, stupid. A country’s chief executive is responsible not only for a country’s physical security but also its economic security. A point that President Obama has not been allowed to forget for a single day since he embarked on his journey to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The result – consciously choosing to kick off his historic visit with India’s commercial capital – Mumbai – announcing business deals worth US$15 billion, supporting 70,000 jobs in the United States, by the close of the three days of his visit.
3. Knowledge is the new global currency, technology the game-changer, people the glue, youth the catalyst.
4. Protectionism doesn’t pay. Growth will come through trade with Asia. It is inevitable and not a zero-sum game. Global economic integration has promise and potential. We need to negotiate this changing relationship.

Or, as President Obama’s icon, Mahatma Gandhi, succinctly observed, ‘be the change you want to see in the world’.

Governance : Can India have too much?

           Image via Wikipedia

In June 2008, Goldman Sachs issued a report titled ‘Ten Things for India to Achieve its 2050 Potential’.  On the top of the list was the clarion call to improve governance.  Fast forward to the present day and an interesting tapestry of regulation and regulatory bodies starts revealing itself.  

In the financial sector, the decks have been cleared for the creation of an interregulatory co-ordination body - the Financial Stability and Development Council, or FSDC. The FSDC has been set up with a view to strengthen and institutionalise the mechanism for maintaining financial stability and development. 

        

The Indian mining sector has occupied centre-stage in the media over the last few months.  The draft of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Bill, 2010 seeks to give wide powers to the National Mining Regulatory Authority. The Bill lists as many as 16 powers granted to the mining regulator, in sharp contrast to the current situation.

In the aviation sector, the autonomous Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) is proposed to supersede the current regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation. 

With respect to corporate governance, there is a proposal to create an over-arching regulator to oversee auditing norms in the country in the new Companies Bill. As per its proposed form, the body will be called the National Advisory Committee on Accounting and Auditing Standards (NACAAS) and require the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to seek a go-ahead from the expert forum before prescribing any norm.  

In the domain of biotechnology, the Indian Cabinet has approved the Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India Bill 2010. The Authority will be set up as an independent and autonomous body to provide a single window mechanism to regulate research, manufacture, import and use of products of modern biotechnology including biosafety clearances of genetically modified crops.

In view of India’s ambitious plans for education (see earlier blog), the Government is creating an over-arching regulatory body called the National Commission for Higher Education and Research (NCHER). 

In the realm of environment, the Minister in charge has taken it on himself to ensure environmental compliance and  preservation.  According to one estimate, he has halted 64 projects and held up 469 due to environmental concerns. Those projects include a US$10.9 billion steel plant proposed by Korea's Posco and two US$2.2 billion power projects.

The recent roll-out of the Unique Identification (Aadhar) project is an excellent example of the potential transformation in transparency in governance that is hoped will be catalysed across India.

The above will add to the 36 regulatory bodies already in existence in India.  More than anything else, it will be vital to ensure that these bodies are fair, impartial, transparent and effective in their functioning. 

While it is critical to have checks, it will be imperative to have balance as well. After all, we all know what absolute power results in.

If you would like to understand more about how you can increase the growth for your organisation by deepening its engagement with India, do write in at ratika.jain@whiteowladvisory.com.